Atrophy of the brachialis muscle after a displaced clavicle fracture in an Ironman triathlete: case report
© Rüst et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 7 July 2011
Accepted: 2 October 2011
Published: 2 October 2011
Clavicle fractures are frequent injuries in athletes and midshaft clavicle fractures in particular are well-known injuries in Ironman triathletes. In 2000, Auzou et al. described the mechanism leading to an isolated truncular paralysis of the musculocutaneous nerve after a shoulder trauma. It is well-known that nerve palsies can lead to an atrophy of the associated muscle if they persist for months or even longer. In this case report we describe a new case of an Ironman triathlete suffering from a persistent isolated atrophy of the brachialis muscle. The atrophy occurred following a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture acquiring while falling off his bike after hitting a duck during a competition.
KeywordsDisplaced clavicle fracture Ironman triathlete muscular-atrophy brachialis muscle brachial plexus
Lesions of the brachial plexus are known to occur after displaced clavicle fractures. The most common way to get a lesion of the brachial plexus is a high-energy trauma leading to traction injuries[1, 2], whereas lesions of the medial and the posterior cord have been reported most frequently[3, 4]. A bone fragment from a displaced clavicle fracture is described in only 1% of the cases as the causative factor. In this report we describe the case of a lesion of both, the musculocutaneous and axillar nerve with subsequent atrophy of the brachialis muscle. Regarding the anatomy, the axillar nerve originates from the posterior cord, whereas the musculocutaneous nerve originates from the lateral cord, which is not known to be affected by such injuries very often. The additional fact that a lesion of the brachial plexus occurred a certain time after a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle makes the case even more interesting and remarkable.
Nine months after the accident the athlete shows a persisting atrophy of the brachialis muscle and a decreased sensibility in the region of the clavicle part of the deltoid muscle, whereas before the operation he also felt a decreased sensibility in the radial part of the forearm. This suggests a lesion of the brachial plexus caused by the two clavicle fragments, indicated with the arrows (see Figure 1 Panel B) involving both, the motor and sensory branches of the musculocutaneous nerve. In most cases, palsies of the brachial plexus are the result of a high-energy trauma leading to traction-injuries associated with an acute onset of the symptoms and poor prognosis, whereas the presence of a clavicle fracture in such cases is much less important[1, 2]. In 1991, Della Santa described, that only 1% of brachial plexus injuries are caused by bone fragments after a clavicle fracture. We assume that in this case both - the sensible as well as the motoric - parts of the musculocutaneus nerve as well as the sensible part of the axillaris nerve were hurt by the clavicle fragments, whereas the sensible part of the musculocutaneus nerve convalesced in the meantime. Therefore, this case report shows an incident with a very rare outcome. The underlying mechanism for this kind of injury was described by Auzou et al. in 2000 and also Rumball et al.  described the onset of brachial plexus palsy after a few days after a displaced clavicle fracture. Other possibilities for the appearance of the symptoms and especially for the delayed onset could be compression from hypertrophic callus[3, 4] or nonunion[4, 6]. Additionally, also cases of secondary brachial plexus palsies after direct compression by a bone fragment have been reported by Reichenbacher and Siebler. The persistent deficiency of the motoric part of the musculocutaneous nerve explains the atrophy of the brachialis muscle the athlete observed. A hyposensitivity in the region of the deltoid muscle is the result of a lesion in the sensible part of the axillar nerve. Anatomically, the musculocutaneous nerve originates from the lateral cord of the brachial plexus and the axillar nerve from the posterior cord, respectively. Miller et al.  as well as Della Santa et al.  showed that most frequently the medial and the posterior cord of the plexus brachialis are involved in such injuries. This agrees with the involvement of the axillar nerve, but not with the involvement of the musculocutaneous nerve, leading to the conclusion, that the athlete described in this case reports suffers from an even more rarely manifestation of coincidence of clavicle fracture and plexus brachialis injury. Based on the success of the healing process the athlete has displayed so far, and also on the neurologist's expert opinion, we assume that he has a good chance of a further recovery of his neurological function. The athlete first tried his old figure-of-eight dressing as a self-treatment and later he decided on an intramedullary nailing after he was advised to have the displaced fracture being fixed. A study of the Canadian Orthopedic Trauma Society in 2007 showed that an operative treatment of clavicle fractures using plate fixation is better than a non-operative treatment regarding to non-union, mal-union and cosmetic aspects. Similar results have been found by Jubel et al. in 2005 for intramedullary nailing and Zlowodzki et al. showed in 2005 that conservative treatment of a displaced clavicle fracture leads to a higher number of pseudarthrosis than an operative treatment, whereas the results were independent of the surgical method. Even if Pieske et al.  could show in their survey-based study in 2008 that the outcome of an operative-treated displaced clavicle fracture is always better than that of a conservatively-treated one, and that intramedullary nailing should be the surgical method of choice. Debates still exist regarding which is the superior fixation method for clavicular fractures[10, 12, 13] and thus each individual should be evaluated independently based on its requirements and wishes. The patient should be the center of the decision-making process, and the attending doctor has to base his decision on the demands of the patient. In this case one of the athlete's most important aims was to be able to continue his training and to participate in competitions again, as soon as possible. Considering the athlete's wishes as well as his general condition and compliance, a treatment with medullary nailing was certainly indicated and was the method of choice. Along with the result that intramedullary nailing is the best available treatment for displaced clavicle fractures, Pieske et al.  could also show that despite of the frequency and, additionally, the large variation of clavicle fractures there is still no standardized classification on hand. According to the classification system suggested by Pieske et al.  the athlete suffered a type A-3 fracture, which means it was a single, midshaft clavicle fracture without any existing contact between the fracture fragments (see Additional File 1). Ultimately an X-Ray in two planes is the gold standard for rating the type as well as degree of dislocation of a midshaft clavicle fracture, and thus should always be carried out to evaluate any further steps.
This case shows that a displaced fragment in a clavicle fracture can lead to a lesion of the brachial plexus with a lesion of the musculocutaneus nerve as well as the axillar nerve and subsequently to an atrophy of the brachialis muscle. Physicians should be aware of this potential complication and diagnostic imaging is a must in any type and grade of fracture to allow a diagnostic-based treatment protocol with the best possible outcome.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
We thank RODIAG Diagnostic Centers, St. Gallen, Switzerland, and Schweizer Paraplegiker Zentrum SPZ, Nottwil, Switzerland for providing X-ray and computer-tomography images, as well as PD Dr. med. Markus Weber and Dr. med. Reto Baldinger, Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Dienste, Muskelzentrum/ALS clinic, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland for providing the report of their neurological examination of the athlete.
For her help in translation, we thank Mary Miller from Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland in England, crew member of an ultra-endurance support crew.
- Rumball KM, Da Silva VF, Preston DN, Carruthers CC: Brachial-plexus injury after clavicular fracture: case report and literature review. Can J Surg 1991, 34:264–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbier O, Malghem J, Delaere O, Vande Berg B, Rombouts JJ: Injury to the brachial plexus by a fragment of bone after fracture of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79:534–536.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller DS, Boswick JA: Lesions of the brachial plexus associated with fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969, 64:144–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Della Santa D, Narakas A, Bonnard C: Late lesions of the brachial plexus after fracture of the clavicle. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 1991, 10:531–540.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auzou P, Le Ber I, Ozsancak C, Ronziere T, Magnier P, Beuret-Blanquart F, Hannequin D: Isolated truncular paralysis of the musculocutaneous nerve of the upper limb. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000, 86:188–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansky B, Murray E, Minami K, Körfer R: Delayed brachial plexus paralysis due to subclavian pseudoaneurysm after clavicular fracture. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993, 7:497–498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reichenbacher D, Siebler G: Early secondary lesions of the brachial plexus--a rare complication following clavicular fracture. Unfallchirurgie 1987, 13:91–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Society COT: Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1–10.Google Scholar
- Jubel A, Andermahr J, Prokop A, Lee J, Schiffer G, Rehm K: Treatment of mid-clavicular fractures in adults. Early results after rucksack bandage or elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Unfallchirurg 2005, 108:707–714.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zlowodzki M, Zelle B, Cole P, Jeray K, McKee M, Group E-BOTW: Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 2005, 19:504–507.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pieske O, Dang M, Zaspel J, Beyer B, Löffler T, Piltz S: Midshaft clavicle fractures--classification and therapy. Results of a survey at German trauma departments. Unfallchirurg 2008, 111:387–394.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klonz A, Hockertz T, Reilmann H: Clavicular fractures. Unfallchirurg 2001, 104:70–81; quiz 80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jubel A, Andermahr J, Faymonville C, Binnebösel M, Prokop A, Rehm K: Reconstruction of shoulder-girdle symmetry after midclavicular fractures. Stable, elastic intramedullary pinning versus rucksack bandage. Chirurg 2002, 73:978–981.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.